(03-14-2022, 09:23 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(03-14-2022, 08:43 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: C'mon man, you really think that the airline would be in the right if they said "You can't use the word "Constitutional" on this flight today, if you do we're throwing you off the flight'"? How about if they said "You are not permitted to pray on this plane today and if you mention Allah we're going to ground the plane and throw you off"? How about "no Cross jewelry permitted"? What's your personal line Marty, the line where they are allowed to take away your basic rights? And why is your line the right one instead of this guy's?

I don't think you understand what I am telling you, or else you just don't want to understand it.  There is no Constitutional right to free speech on an airline.  It's doesn't matter where I would draw the line or where you would draw the line.  The right to "draw the line" lies with the airline.  They're not taking away anyone's "basic rights" when they tell them they cannot wear a political slogan.

So you don't understand that there was no rule in place not allowing this?

You don't understand it was the INDIVIDUAL flight attendant that had a problem?

You're the one that doesn't get what this is about. The flight attendant arbitrarily decided to throw this man out based on a shirt - and he complied willingly. Kudos to him.

He violated only one person's sense of propriety. WHO [BLEEP] CARES?

It's discrimination and it's a little sad you can't see it because when it happens to you people just like you will agree with the fascist flight attendant.

---