(03-14-2022, 11:46 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(03-14-2022, 11:45 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: You're gonna cherry pick one play? He was extremely inconsistent. I'd rather have a receiver that can consistently move the chains 10-12 yards than have a guy who can get deep and make a big play every once in a great while, but disappears most of the time. This team needs consistency at the WR position. We don't have a single WR who can routinely get open and move the chains. I'm not talking about getting some superstar WR either. If we could just get someone like a Robert Woods or Amari Cooper type, I'd be thrilled. There isn't those types of WR's in this free agent class.

Buddy. They need both types of receivers.

A receiver like Kirk can only be successful if a consistent possession receiver can draw coverage underneath. He had that in Arizona with Hopkins and he was still extremely inconsistent. Kirk is basically a smaller version of Jalen Guyton.

---

(03-14-2022, 11:50 AM)RicoTx Wrote:

(03-14-2022, 11:45 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: You're gonna cherry pick one play? He was extremely inconsistent. I'd rather have a receiver that can consistently move the chains 10-12 yards than have a guy who can get deep and make a big play every once in a great while, but disappears most of the time. This team needs consistency at the WR position. We don't have a single WR who can routinely get open and move the chains. I'm not talking about getting some superstar WR either. If we could just get someone like a Robert Woods or Amari Cooper type, I'd be thrilled. There isn't those types of WR's in this free agent class.

Kirk has better numbers than Woods did his first four years.  What's to say he can't make a jump?

Because he will be going from a team where he had one of the top 3 WR's in the NFL on the other side of him to coming here and having no help what so ever.

---