(03-29-2022, 04:36 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(03-29-2022, 04:00 PM)Mikey Wrote: So is it better to darft a WR and cut/PS them and miss out on the RB you feel is the best fit among the undrafted? If we take 3 WR, there's a very good chance two end up waived before the season starts.

Do you honestly consider RB to be a position we are good at? I might agree with "could be good at", but that conditional depends a whole lot on both RBs' recovery and ability to avoid reinjury. I have a lot more confidence in an RB drafted late sticking on this roster than I do any of the WR 'jars on the shelf'.

I guess we agree, it's about using the picks wisely. I just see more wisdom addressing the uncertainty we presently have at RB than at flooding the market with players at a position we've already invested a ton in, whether you like the players there or not.

I don't think so. I think our WR unit as it stands now, is putrid. The only guys I think are a lock to make the roster are Kirk and Agnew. 

I never said we are good at RB. I like James Robinson a lot when he is healthy and we spent a first round pick on Etienne, so like it or not, those guys are our starters. I just don't see spending a pick on a RB when that RB is gonna be relegated to 3rd string by probably the 6th game of the season, if not sooner when Robinson and Etienne are healthy. I believe there are very good late round WR's in this draft that could easily beat out below average WR's like Marvin Jones, Shenault, Zay Jones and Treadwell for a roster spot.