(04-01-2022, 02:17 PM)chris hill Wrote:

(04-01-2022, 01:58 PM)Upper Wrote: First of all, they aren't trading 32 and 34 to move up one spot.

Second, those 4 players would be the nightmare scenario if we had those picks.

how is it a nightmare with best tackle, best guard, good te and good wr.. if anything itll make this offense even more dangerous.. i think ur way of thinking is like anywhere from 1-10 i would say 5 or under..

1. I don't think Neal is the best tackle.

2. Kenyon is FAR from the best guard. He is a terrible athlete, it's a non premium position, and it's a very valuable pick. If we're taking an IOL at 33 it better be Zion or Linderbaum surprisingly falling. I wouldn't even take Kenyon at 65 or 70.

3. Dotson would be a fine pick at 33 if we hadn't signed Kirk and Engram. He's a slot that you can kind of stretch into a Z at times, but he won't be the answer to our need at X. His vs man and vs press stats from college were very bad, and his vs zone and over the middle heat map was very good. He's basically Kirk.

4. There isn't a top 50 TE in this class, McBride or any other. McBride is also almost guaranteed to be too small to play inline, so he is redundant with both Engram and Arnold. If he falls to 65 or 70 then sure; McBride, Dulcich, or Likely would be fine there. Even better would be Jelani at 106 or Bellinger with a 5th or 6th rounder.

---