I guess I just don't get the board's obsession with Ronster. Obviously, he is biased, but he's an insignificant figure in the big picture, and he's not wrong for pointing out this kind of blatant manipulation by an institution with actual power. We have a genuine problem with our media slanting information, and, quite frankly, if they would do their job, I think you'd see the Ronsters of the world start to chill out a bit. One groups hypocrisy + power is created a group of people who are beginning to radically push against that power. Ronster is just the cowbell. You should take his criticism seriously, even if they are one-sided and heavy-handed. He's not the MSM, and making that equivocation just seems odd to me, even if it was meant to be a joke.

---