(04-19-2022, 11:25 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: I always ignored the guy because he’s nothing more than a yapping loon. Then he crossed this line and I wished bad fortune upon him. Thankfully it’s happening.

(pointing around the room) Don’t mess with homebiscuit.

I won’t mess with you, but if I ever feel I’m in the same restaurant as you, I’m most definitely eating my food with my fork upside down.  Mainly just to get a rise out of you. No matter how awkward it is for me.  And I respect you.  So don’t take it the wrong way.

---

(04-19-2022, 06:40 PM)Norman Mushari Wrote:

(04-19-2022, 04:26 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Disinformation negates all of these points you are attempting to make. 

Disinformation is falsehood willingly spread with the intent to deceive. It is much worse than, and not to be confused with misinformation. It is much more akin to propaganda. 

Why does willful deception ever deserve a platform anywhere? 
It's not about whether he's "silly" or someone "not believing in him" - he willfully spread lies with intent to deceive and he did it for personal gain and political interest. This isn't a case of silencing the voice of someone with a different view. It's punishing a lying idiot intent on doing harm to others to advance his own agenda.

who decides whats misinformation?
who decides how far off you have to be to be punished?

Maybe the people who told him this incorrect info had told him good info before.  maybe he really believed his source.
Can you 100% tell me he didn't really believe the info?  its not illegal to be stupid.

again, im not against the law suit.  im against the silencing.

There’s two sides.  Right and wrong. Not left and right.  It’s up to you to decide where you belong.  Just dont confuse the two.

---