(04-19-2022, 09:52 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote:

(04-19-2022, 07:09 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Apparently 4 separate courts of law are "who decides." 
And they have decided in favor of those Jones defamed with his disinformation. 

Continually broadcasting easily verified lies doesn't make one "stupid." It makes one responsible for the legal consequence of those actions. 

There is no requirement to prove he believed anything.

Who's arguing the decision?

Some of us are saying he shouldn't be deplatformed, but should be financially punished, which he was. That's why we have the courts. We don't need twitter and youtube deciding who has a voice.

The user I responded to questioned the entitlement of such decision making. I answered. You are contorting the intent. I never implied an argument of the decision. I answered the question asked about it. 

We don't "need" a lot of things. 

Private companies deciding to remove access to users spreading blatant falsehoods repeatedly are well within their rights to do so. And they are also free to make those decisions on a case by case basis. 

You're free to seek alternatives twitter, YouTube or any other platform you feel utilizes undue censorship.

---