(04-20-2022, 09:53 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(04-20-2022, 05:35 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Shocker. Still haven't addressed the point. I know you think you're wowing us all with your brilliance by puffing up your chest and talking up to others with unearned confidence, but highlighting one word is not winning a debate. Most of us don't need to ruminate on the word 'disinformation.' 

Again, I ask you. Who decides what is disinformation? How to you prove it? You said the courts before, but did you know, that the courts haven't proven whether or not Alex Jones was intentionally deceiving the public? That wasn't a part of this process. They proved he profited from spreading falsehoods about a tragedy, but they can't even get the evidence to prove motive. So, tell me Mr. Smartest Guy in the Room, do we create special trials to prove what's disinformation? Will that get applied evenly to large corporations? Will that apply to our government? Then, how we decide who gets censored for it? For how long? 

The reason you are so ill equipped to process this is because it's not grammar. It's not black and white, and you're just not a nuanced person. At least you don't play one on this messageboard.

I don't think there was ever a shred of doubt about whether or not it was disinformation and i've been clear as a bell on it.

You keep trying to change the point to that debate. That was never the point. 

There is no debate. 

You wanna go around believing that clown didn't know he was spreading falsehood with intent to deceive, you have right at it. 

I mean, it makes you a complete [BLEEP] fool, but go for it.

I personally like it when everyone has a platform to speak what they believe.

I'd rather know exactly what a person thinks than be blindsided by their stupidity just because they had the intelligence to shut up about their moronic ideas and opinions for most of their life.

It's always better for light to be shined on all things - even the darkness.

---