(04-22-2022, 09:35 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(04-22-2022, 09:23 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Lol, do we? We need to presume that some people looked into it and didn't find anything. There is video after video of people dumping ballots. There's verifiable track record of corporate money being used to redirect oversight of voting procedures that resulted in staggering changes to the vote total in 6 key swing states. There's bragging coming from the media and the establishment in the form of "WE DID IT," as it pertains to the ousting of Trump. There's proof that the FBI aided and encouraged the protests of January 6th to go further than necessary, and a track record of them persecuting all Trump supporters. You really think this group is doing outstanding investigations into the integrity of the vote? The election numbers are staggeringly out of line with anything we've seen in previous elections. It was obvious to me as soon as the totals started coming in. 

Is there not even the slightest possibility in your mind that people found him a big enough threat to the stability of the establishment that they all turned a blind eye to corruption of the voting procedures in this instance? It certainly appears that way in GA. I don't think Republicans were ever supposed to lose the house, but they did, and the same people who swore up and down the election was secure moved to change the voting laws to "fix" it.

A lot of people thought the vote totals were suspicious in November 2020.
Not one person found any evidence of a fake voter placing a fake vote. Don't you think that person would have gotten to Fox News, Newsmax, OAN, and gotten the word out?
They published so many theories about the machines themselves being hacked, and they got sued for it because there was no evidence to such libelous accusations.  Those cases are pending.  Legal fees are stacking up.  Still no credible evidence of machine problems, almost all ballots were paper.  The media was definitely willing to publish all sorts of theories, evidence or not.
Yet they did not publish evidence of even one person saying, "the voting rolls say I voted, but I didn't vote." No one found a single person with that testimony.  Yet, according to you, there are a quarter of a million people out there with that story.

Who is looking up their vote? The kind of person who is disengaged is not typically checking to see if they voted. To your point, there was a major story about a college student who had someone vote for him. He checked out of curiosity and realize someone voted on his behalf. It made news stories for a couple days, then went away. Not that it matters, because your follow up will be that it's only one guy, am I right?

---