(04-23-2022, 03:37 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I misspoke. It was that there was 100% turnout in most of the retirement homes in swing counties. That's highly improbable. The WEC allowed changes that took away the special requirement to collect votes in retirement homes and you suddenly have a spike? That's a great coincidence, is it not? You're right in that we don't know who they voted for, but what do you think the odds are, man? I bet you think Republicans and democrats cheated an the same rate, huh. Or that these invalids who were voting just hated Trump so much, right? Lol.

"Gableman vetted the vote at 30 nursing homes in Milwaukee County, 12 in Racine County, and 24 in Dane County and found 100 percent turnout: All 2,155 registered voters in those 66 homes cast their ballots.  At nine facilities in Kenosha County, the voter turnout was 97 percent.  At 16 homes in Brown County, turnout was 95 percent."

There was also a sheriff that did an investigation in Racine County and came to the same result. The DA failed to prosecute because she said the people in charge of the nursing home didn't live in her district. Lol, what a joke. She didn't prosecute the other people that participated because they surely didn't understand the nuances of election law. Then the DNC releases a statement saying there was no fraud because no one was prosecuted. <------This is where you come in. You are so uninformed, man.

What evidence do you need? Who needs to present it? This is the playbook for the Dems stealing the election in Wisconsin, and there is plenty of evidence that suggests the colluded to tilt the odds in their favor.

https://www.maciverinstitute.com/2022/03...an-groups/



By way of comparison, statewide turnout was around 76 percent.

Right, there's probable cause to say that ballot harvesting occurred there in a way that may have been criminal under Wisconsin law. Harvesting is still real people placing real votes, so it's not fraudulent, but it is criminal in most states because it is too easy for a harvester to say they wish to see the ballot they are harvesting and thus violate the secrecy that everyone is supposed to enjoy.

Prosecutors prosecute people who don't live in their jurisdiction all the time.  They prosecute people who were ignorant of the law all the time.  So we either have a really bad prosecutor here or a really bad journalist, perhaps both.  

What we don't have is any allegation that any of these nursing home patients had their ballot secrecy violated, so it's extremely unlikely that all 2,155 of those harvested votes went for Biden.  

We also don't have enough total votes here to say the outcome was changed.  Harvesting wouldn't have done that.  You have to find ballots that went to fake people or ballots that were diverted away from real people first.

---