(04-23-2022, 03:14 AM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:

(04-21-2022, 12:57 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: So you have changed your mind from seeing "no reason for hope" and from calling coaches and receivers "excuses for his terrible play." 

Interesting sea change.

It's crazy how narrow minded the people of this board can be. Let me ask you this. If we had 3 pro bowl WRs last year, you'd agree that the drops would likely have happened far less often right? At the same time, do you think that the interceptions Trevor threw directly into a linebackers hands, or passes that soared over his WRs heads (uncatchable) would have changed based on the WRs? Ofcourse not. 

Obviously having better players and play calling will help anybody play better, it does not excuse the mistakes he made. I'd imagine he'd be the first to tell you he had plenty of them.

What are you talking about?

This isn't narrow minded.  

I merely pointed out that you've clearly changed your mind on Trevor Lawrence. 

You have posted on more than one occasion that nothing from his rookie season gave you reason for hope -  and you repeatedly called other posters "homers" and "nut huggers" for citing bad play around him and bad coaching as reasons he struggled. 

NOW - you have said you expect Trevor Lawrence in year 2 to be "at the very least - above average" and that you expect "a huge jump due to having a real NFL HC." 

Your prior comments are in direct contradiction to your newfound declaration of Trevor Lawrence expectations as well as the factors of his rookie year struggles. 

Is there something wrong with me pointing out how different your prior comments are to this new stance you've taken?

---