The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
53 man roster
|
(05-06-2022, 03:20 PM)jaglou53 Wrote: With free agency and the draft having concluded, the 53 man roster should look like this: That looks pretty good. I don't see too many differences. If you count Agnew as a wide receiver, the roster above is weighted towards offense with 27 offense versus 23 defense. I think they cut Luton and keep Arden Key. That would make it 26 versus 24. I also think either Treadwell or Austin is cut, most likely Treadwell, in favor of another defensive player. Signing Treadwell this year doesn't guarantee that he will make the team. Treadwell provided insurance in case of injuries. The Jags also didn't know Austin would become available. Treadwell's dead cap is only around $400K. Teams will cut a player with a million or two in dead cap and not blink. As for the defensive player, it could be Jordan Smith. He was a 4th rounder from just last year that was considered a developmental project when drafted. Another option would be keeping a defensive player like Chapelle Russell for special teams. |
Messages In This Thread |
53 man roster - by jaglou53 - 05-06-2022, 03:20 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by NYC4jags - 05-06-2022, 03:30 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jag88 - 05-06-2022, 03:57 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by irontrooper83 - 05-06-2022, 05:38 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by NYC4jags - 05-06-2022, 05:40 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by jaglou53 - 05-06-2022, 06:35 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by ChrisJagBoy - 05-07-2022, 01:01 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jag149 - 05-06-2022, 07:52 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by ATLjag - 05-06-2022, 09:44 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by NYC4jags - 05-06-2022, 10:07 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by jaglou53 - 05-07-2022, 11:30 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by ATLjag - 05-07-2022, 03:24 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jagsman - 05-06-2022, 10:03 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by NYC4jags - 05-07-2022, 12:46 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Cleatwood - 05-07-2022, 03:31 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by NH3 - 05-09-2022, 10:03 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by TheDuke007 - 05-07-2022, 01:09 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by jaglou53 - 05-07-2022, 02:56 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Newton - 05-07-2022, 03:08 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by TownCenterJag - 05-07-2022, 04:05 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jag88 - 05-07-2022, 04:16 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jagsman - 05-08-2022, 11:46 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jag88 - 05-09-2022, 09:50 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by ATLjag - 05-09-2022, 08:53 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by HURRICANE!!! - 05-09-2022, 09:52 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by TrivialPursuit - 05-09-2022, 10:04 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by rpr52121 - 05-09-2022, 10:12 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by HURRICANE!!! - 05-09-2022, 10:17 AM
RE: 53 man roster - by Jagsman - 05-09-2022, 03:00 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by Cleatwood - 05-09-2022, 04:04 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by HURRICANE!!! - 05-09-2022, 04:14 PM
RE: 53 man roster - by MarleyJag - 05-09-2022, 04:22 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.