(05-10-2022, 08:40 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(05-10-2022, 07:39 AM)jj82284 Wrote: I'm not talking about a caste system.  I'm talking about viewing matting through an economic lense.  On average women make more than men until they are 35 years old.  For women to view men as suitable long term partners they want guys that make around 50% more than them.  That math doesn't work!  Right now. We designed a system to waste guys time.  If the goal is to become an economically attractive man with a family the displacement of men till their mid thirties is a recipe for disaster.

There are some areas where women under 30 earn slightly more than men under 30. In most of this US this is not true.
But now you seem to be talking out of both sides of your mouth.
First you said women need to avoid deadbeats.
Now you're saying that women should accept men who earn about the same amount as them, rather than holding out for someone who earns 50% more.
Which is it? What did I miss?