(06-04-2022, 08:19 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(06-04-2022, 08:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: I asked you 4 questions.

No answer, I take it. 

Here's another question for you:
Why in the world would the player's camp leak a contract detail that makes the player look stupid and his agent look incompetent?

It was 50+ in the first 2 years, that means it was at least a 3 year deal.  Thats what we know


How does that make the player look stupid and his agent incompetent leaking out the type of contractthey are looking for?  So are you saying he wasnt worth that now lol? Some thought we should of gave him more than that.  If those numbers were false don't you think Yawn or his agent would of came out and said so?  They thought he was a 20+ mil per year player but he wasn't and they overvalued him, once again why he fired his agent.  He was getting horrible advice from his agent on what his value was.

 50 million guaranteed?  Again we don't know. 

19 per year guaranteed, or attainable through incentive?  Again we don't know. 

Three year deal means nothing if the team has an out clause after one or two years and a 3 year deal is insulting to a player with his production and age at the time.  Why do you keep ignoring all of this? 

Why are you so certain about leaked numbers that are unconfirmed? 

Turning down that money looks bad because it was more than a fair amount if accurate and if the deal wasn't lopsided with sketchy terms. 
They didn't refute the leak because they had already shut down negotiations 3 weeks before that leak was tweeted. They were done and awaiting a trade. If you want a team to trade for you, you'd want them to think you're worth 19 mil per year. You wouldn't say  "They never offered me that much money!"

---