(06-05-2022, 10:44 AM)p_rushing Wrote:

(06-05-2022, 09:52 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: Sounds more to me like they went with an entirely new system, which would mean there would be no real prospect of going back, particularly if banking regulations were the reason for the cut over to a new system. If it was just integrating to new external Financial systems, then that should be more easily testable and fixable.

I'm sure they tested it but it appears they missed something in the migration or sizing. Banks have very high testing standards, so don't see how they wouldn't have tested it.

What I meant by the data storage or structure changing is that they were moving to a new platform or completely changing the backend. That way the legacy front-end no longer works with the new platform. If they build code to keep the data in sync across both, they could run in parallel.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

Don't know man; some financial institutions have such Antiquated systems and software (think Honeywell mainframes running ANSI COBOL) that there's no telling what they migrated from or to. I've seen some real odd systems over the years, especially during Y2K when everyone was moving off large IBM or Honeywell platforms to client server or distributed middleware systems.

---