Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Minneapolis teachers union contract calls for layoffs of white teachers first

#22
(This post was last modified: 08-15-2022, 03:57 PM by homebiscuit.)

(08-15-2022, 02:57 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-15-2022, 02:02 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: Then seniority protocols don’t apply because of race. That’s racist.

Considering race in decision making is not inherently racist.  Read the article carefully.  The policy speaks of some races being under-represented.  That race could be white, or black, or any other category. At this time whites are over-represented, but in time that could change and then the same policy would favor white people.

So let’s put this scenario out there: A minority teacher teaching in a mostly white school is RIF’d. Does she go so a white teacher with less seniority can stay because she represents the greatest amount of students? After all, it’s about the children, correct?

(08-15-2022, 03:48 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(08-15-2022, 03:33 PM)Sneakers Wrote: Wrong!  Considering ANYTHING other than a candidate's qualifications is discriminatory in some way, be it race, gender, age, religious beliefs, etc.

If you have a significant number of minority students, it will behoove you to make race one of the qualifications for the candidates. Not mandatory, of course, but as a preference. Just like you would prefer to have a teacher who grew up in the same area, speaking the same language. That's what the research says.

What research?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-14-2022, 07:56 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-15-2022, 02:02 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-15-2022, 02:57 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Sneakers - 08-15-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-15-2022, 03:48 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by The Real Marty - 08-16-2022, 01:50 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Lucky2Last - 08-16-2022, 02:38 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Ronster - 08-16-2022, 03:07 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by The Real Marty - 08-18-2022, 06:06 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-16-2022, 05:22 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Ronster - 08-16-2022, 06:11 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-16-2022, 07:04 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Jags - 08-16-2022, 08:03 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-15-2022, 03:54 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-15-2022, 08:38 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by americus 2.0 - 08-16-2022, 12:18 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by Ronster - 08-16-2022, 06:52 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-16-2022, 09:02 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-16-2022, 09:44 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-16-2022, 10:21 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-16-2022, 10:37 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-16-2022, 10:49 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-16-2022, 10:57 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 08-16-2022, 11:02 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-16-2022, 11:32 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by Sneakers - 08-15-2022, 09:08 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!