Look, dude... how much do you actually know about what Presidents take or don't take from the Whitehouse? How much do you actually know about their interactions with the National Archives after the fact? Or the FBI playing a role as a go between? You don't know any of that. There is a legitimate debate going on right now between actual scholars about how documents are declassified by the President, so the experts don't "know." Why do you confidently assert such things? You don't KNOW [BLEEP].

Admittedly, I don't know if Trump illegally held documents or not. I would NEVER blindly support Trump, as I think he narcissistic and pigheaded and generally unaware of US procedures. He might have stuff he shouldn't have. I don't know. HOWEVER, I do know that the FBI has abused its power more than once in trying to bring down Trump.

Federal Judge Rosemary Collyer wrote this about the FBI "The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above. The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,”

The FBI lawyer that filed the document for the FISA courts falsified information and plead guilty.

The FBI pushed the Russian Hoax narrative, knowing the pretense for it was false.

Peter Strok and his mistress, both FBI agents, admitted to trying to stop Trump from winning in 2016 via texts. They were involved in pushing the Russia Hoax, even though they knew before getting warrants that Steele's information was false. The FBI used that data to obtain warrants to search people connected to the Trump campaign.

We know that the FBI contact social media corporations to tell them to censor Hunter Biden laptop information, even though they had the laptop and examined the evidence and knew it was true. Why? If you're not stupid, you should realize they are following a similar pattern... to keep Trump from winning.

How many abuses need to occur before it starts to show up on your radar, man? The possibility that this is just another attempt to frame and discredit Trump should be very much a plausibility to you. You are so fixated on perceived abuses by Trump that you completely ignore the actual exploitation and degradation of our institutions designed to protect us. Stop chasing a boogeyman and focus on the real danger.

These are just the offenses related to Trump. I could easily make a list much longer of their recent abuses that have shown to attack anything that represents a threat to the establishment, from J6 to the persecution of Project Veritas. Wake up, dude.

---