Back in 2016, I remember on Fox News Napolitano said Hillary Clinton would be indicted, so, while what he wrote in this case was interesting, you do have to take it with a grain of salt.

---

(08-31-2022, 06:36 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I agree with a lot of what Napolitano is saying, but I don't think anyone can be aware of all the rules and regulations. The law has become so muddled that you could arrest almost anyone for anything. Trump does himself no favors, but it's the selective application of the law that bothers me. If Trump and Hillary were reversed, he would have been indicted for her server incident.

By the time of the FBI raid, the Trump people and I assume Trump himself, were well aware of the applicable law, since this had been going on for over a year and a half.  Trump's people told the government they had scoured Mar-A-Lago for any more government documents, and hadn't found any, but the FBI was able to go in and find all sorts of stuff easily, so it sure looks like the Trump people were being deceptive about it.  Why is still a mystery.

Here's a good explanation of what the feds are alleging:  

https://dnyuz.com/2022/08/30/justice-dep...ng-to-him/

And one other interesting thing- Trump's filing in favor of a special master to review the documents in question says that anyone who is appointed a special master should have a top-secret/SCI security clearance.  But if the documents were actually declassified as Trump has claimed several times, why would the special master need a top-secret security clearance to review the documents?  It appears the Trump legal team is admitting the documents were not declassified.

---