That's funny. I just had this same discussion with my wife about a week ago. She said I was being a misogynist and left to go to work. When she got back, I had pulled up party affiliations by gender, voting activity by gender, and issue voting by gender. She apologized for getting overly emotional about it and agreed with me (which is why I have the best wife). Obviously, women aren't a monolith, despite what the feminist movement tries to project, but they are disproportionately hurting the country in certain areas just as men have hurt it in others. It's categorically unfair to put the blame solely on women, though. I think it needs to be stated emphatically that this isn't exclusive to women, nor is it useful to say that their concerns are not valid.

I think women tend to be motivated by their need for security and nurture, and men are motivated by sex and power. Both are important in healthy societies. It's not a coincidence that most democratic policies offer the promise of security in the form of government intervention and nurture in the form of collective outcomes, even if those promises are unrealistic, while simultaneously offering sex to men through the promise of sexual liberation, which coincidentally, has created the opposite effect. On the other hand, I think conservative policies offer security in the form of order, which creates strong family units and nurture, and men sex and power with their status in the family. Men have abandoned that status, and I think it's created an opportunity for government to fill that role.

---