(09-19-2022, 01:47 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:

(09-19-2022, 01:20 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: He’s telling everyone over and over again how he makes his evaluations which is purely on stat lines (notice how often he quotes them) and now above by playing the odds because he held out hope for Bortles and Gabbert too long.  This is what someone does when they have no idea what they’re looking at on Sunday which is fine.  I would venture a guess that most fans don’t really know what they’re looking at other than the end result of the play and end result of the game and the vast majority don’t go back and re-watch games to evaluate.  So no problem with where he’s coming from, it’s the emotional investment in such a bad take, the constant back and forth of doubling down and then hedging not long after and the inflated level of self importance that are the problems.

So you think my evaluation of him from clemson, was based on his rookie stats that happened months and months after i posted my opinion? If i went purely off stats from clemson then i would have been excited and pumped about him dont u think? Also holding out hope for blake n blaine wasnt me thinking they were good, it was just me hoping our team would win and being a good little fan. Iv linked the thread i made on my old acct the day after we drafted bortles where i said i dont like him and dont understand why we took him, and the same sheep on this board were defending him the same way they defend trevor with blind homerism

---

(09-19-2022, 01:20 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: He’s telling everyone over and over again how he makes his evaluations which is purely on stat lines (notice how often he quotes them) and now above by playing the odds because he held out hope for Bortles and Gabbert too long.  This is what someone does when they have no idea what they’re looking at on Sunday which is fine.  I would venture a guess that most fans don’t really know what they’re looking at other than the end result of the play and end result of the game and the vast majority don’t go back and re-watch games to evaluate.  So no problem with where he’s coming from, it’s the emotional investment in such a bad take, the constant back and forth of doubling down and then hedging not long after and the inflated level of self importance that are the problems.

So you think my evaluation of him from clemson, was based on his rookie stats that happened months and months after i posted my opinion? If i went purely off stats from clemson then i would have been excited and pumped about him dont u think? Also holding out hope for blake n blaine wasnt me thinking they were good, it was just me hoping our team would win and being a good little fan. Iv linked the thread i made on my old acct the day after we drafted bortles where i said i dont like him and dont understand why we took him, and the same sheep on this board were defending him the same way they defend trevor with blind homerism