(11-17-2022, 10:56 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-17-2022, 09:52 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: No [BLEEP]. We've had this conversation before. It's called a preponderance of evidence and the appearance of impropriety. Of course, we don't have evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Nobody is saying that. If we did, people would already be in jail (lol, jk). 

Democrats used Covid to push a narrative that we needed mail-in voting, the least historically secure method of voting. Since then, most of our swing states went hard blue in heavily populated counties, while almost every other state in the country swung right, even the blue ones. It's not a coincidence. 

You can explain away the statistical anomalies all you want of which there are many, all in favor of the same party, all only in toss up or swing elections. Whether or not it's cheating (it is), this is a bad system that is making voters feel disenfranchised, and you don't care. Don't get me wrong, you'd care if the full weight of the media was telling you to care. Unfortunately, the media is lying to you. They are shills who don't report news. They report propaganda. The moderates in this country need to stop being so [BLEEP] obtuse.

Preponderance of evidence? You have *no* evidence.
You have suspicions.

---

(11-17-2022, 09:00 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: What we have is repetition of statistical anomalies that always fall one direction after unusual electoral operations followed by a refusal to transparently address the public's concerns about the process.

Vote by mail is not unusual.
More democrats than Republicans use that option in most states. That could be called an anomaly, but it's consistent and explained.