(12-14-2022, 12:29 PM)carp8dm Wrote:

(12-14-2022, 12:26 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Yes, that's how it is. Inside your brain - after assuming a bunch of things that are in no way guaranteed to happen. 

Enjoy fantasy land, I guess. You're gonna see it how you want to see it regardless of facts.

I could say the exact same to you.  

Agree to disagree.

I always enjoy our debates...  I normally agree with you.  But there are obvious moments that we clearly are at odds.

Such is life.

EDIT -  Just in case you didn't see it...  The fumble happened at 1:49 in the 2nd.  Do you really think if there was no fumble, that we'd have been able to answer?

All good, my friend. 

I think if they didn't fumble, we had just as much chance of holding them to 3 as we had to let them score a TD.

I think our red zone defensive stats support that. 

And whether we would answer with a score cannot be known. 
We did, in fact, score on the first possession of the second half - which would have been the "answer" you are asking about if there wasn't time to score in the first half. 
And, as it turned out,  that would have still been enough point differential for a win.

---