(12-14-2022, 11:55 AM)carp8dm Wrote:

(12-14-2022, 11:34 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Are you for real?

Why does it matter that he had 2 yards in the 2nd half? That doesn't mean it's a fact that the fumble lead to him having 2 yards. That's not a direct correlation.

OK.  

Sorry...  I just thought that cause and effect results would mean something to you. 

But you're right, there are tons of plays that make up a game.  

I just think Shaq Q's is up there in terms of changing the game.

Especially when you realize that Henry was killing us right up untill the fumble and then we scored 14 points before the tacks got the ball back...  

But I guess it's true that one cannot fully admit that any variable from one point in time to another can be a result of another based on the quantum mechanics of a split second in time.  

Either way, it was a great game!  And, to me, I think it was Shaq's hit that changed the entire game...  (I mean, Henry disappeared after that hit.  But whatever)

Henry disappeared before that.

For the second Q, they ran 10 plays. Henry's input:
not targeted
not targeted
run for no gain
not targeted (INT)
not targeted
not targeted
not targeted (PUNT)
run 2
run 21
catch 16 (FUM)

why did they stop giving him the workload? Afraid that he'd fade before the second half even started? They were trying to force the pass against us, and it bit them in the rear.

---