I don't want to derail the thread, but I would like to mention one thing that I have been thinking about lately.  In reference to the QB-HC duo, it's nice to have a great HC and a great QB, but it seems to me that the ultimate HC-QB duo involves a HC that is the de facto offensive coordinator.  When the HC is designing and calling the plays, along with a great QB, that is the most stable combination you can have, because you can maintain year to year continuity in your offensive system, even if you lose your offensive coordinator to a head coaching job somewhere else.  For example, if the Jags lost Press Taylor to a head coaching job somewhere else, our offense wouldn't change.  We would maintain the same system, the same plays, the same play-calling.      Kansas City has the same thing with Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.  It's the ideal combination of HC and QB.  But look what happened in New England when they lost Josh McDaniels.  New England is floundering around, still trying to figure out who should be running the offense.  But if KC lost Eric Bieniemy, would that happen?  No, because it's Andy Reid's offense, and he also calls the plays.  Same thing here in Jacksonville.  We won't have another team pull the brains out of our offense by hiring away our offensive coordinator to be their head coach.  Because our head coach, Doug Pederson, is actually the offensive coordinator.

So, bottom line, what I am trying to say is, the ideal combination of HC and QB is when the HC is actually, in fact if not in name, the offensive coordinator.

---