The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Getting money out of politics in the US
|
The highest paid earner in a company can only make (x)amount more than the lowest earner. That gets capped at (x)median household income. Currently, I'm thinking 100 times more is the sweet spot, but I'd like to find an open-minded economist to run numbers on this theory. If your lowest earner makes 30k a year, the highest can make 3 million, but he can't make more than 7 million per year if the median household income is only 70k. This is capitalism that caps the most paid among us, but doesn't actually obstruct the market.
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.