Quote:You are correct.

 

I think what you are missing is that those of us that are critical of him are looking at this situation as a microcosm of his overall behavior.

 

At this point, you cannot give the dude the benefit of the doubt.

 

You get that, right?

If no details were available about the incident...you'd have a valid point. But the fact that he wasn't high, he wasn't drunk and he wasn't at fault for the accident, according to the police, means that you don't have to "give him the benefit of the doubt". That's what you do when you don't know the pertinent information to be able to make a judgement....

---