(04-20-2023, 01:44 PM)Bullseye Wrote:

(04-20-2023, 12:09 PM)Caldrac Wrote: I think just based on everything that's been said this offseason along with this class overall. You would have to think they're building towards the future and with that in mind. They need to walk away from this class with more than likely:

1. Two pass rushers, one for rotational purposes and one for replacing Josh Allen going into 2024.

2. Nickel/Slot CB - This can be had probably as early as RD1 with Branch, whom I am not 100% sold on, or, as late as RD3/RD4.

3. Swing tackle with starting guard potential or vice versa.  

4. Two tight ends, one for blocking and sealing the edge in particular and one with pass catching skills in the event Engram is gone.

They invested a lot of money and resources last year in getting the LB core shored up and some of the front four groups shored up. They invested in a little bit on offense with Engram, Scherff and Ridley. The problem is that age and contract situations are going to make this a slippery slope going into 2024. 

They'll have to navigate a very tight rope, balancing act next week to prepare for this. Robinson and Little may or may not be the answers at LT and RT. Engram may not want to come back as our TE1. Ridley could be boom or bust and you have contracts tied up with Kirk and Jones there in the WR room already. LG is weak. RG is concerning if Scherff takes an injury. 

Defensively you have Josh Allen and Rayshawn Jenkins potentially out of here after 2023. Then you get into unique situations contract wise potentially with Campbell, Cisco, Fatukasi & Williams. The value is deep in this class at CB, TE and EDGE. I don't think they have to drop the 24th overall pick on any of those positions but the odds of a top flight LT/RT or G being there is probably slim to none.

This is the one draft where I would love to see a trade back scenario unfold just so we can get better value overall and add more quality depth to make up for these holes we'll see in 2024/2025 but it's anyone's guess.

1.  I think the two pass rushers is a good idea.  Aside from never having too many of them. you could argue we are actually in a deficit because we don't have a true dominator at edge.  Furthermore, as much as I'd like to keep Josh Allen, re-signing Trevor could make keeping Allen an impossibility.  We will have top be prepared to move on if re-signing Trevor means allowing Allen to wak.

2.  Instead of drafting two TE, I think I'd rather draft two DBs-one at starting CB and one a NB/S.

3.   I am with you completely on #3.

Value depends heavily on the CB and TE pairing for me. I would like Garrett Williams and Riley Moss in this draft class and I had a chance to take them both in RD4 but I just couldn't pass up on Anthony Bradford out of LSU. I really like his upside. Especially now after what Baalke said about Bartch this afternoon in that press conference. Plus, Scherff, he's not going to be here for much longer. 

Mekhi Blackmon out of LSU would be another guy at CB to keep an eye out for. Big guy wise I like Julius Brents and Carrington Valentine though. Probably 2nd (Brents, mostly) or 6th RD options there.

---