(04-21-2023, 05:02 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(04-21-2023, 04:06 PM)Bullseye Wrote: But T is harder to find than G.  More valuable too.

That said, I'd be happy with Torrence and any number of other players.

You take a tackle and he might not even start this year.  I think you could upgrade Cam but I don't think it's a need and I think Little will settle in at RT as he get more experience there.  I also think Torrence is better than most tackles in this draft.  Just take whoever you feel will be the best player.

Given the state of this team, there would be very few first year starters.  But even assuming a T doesn't start at T his rookie year, if we hit on the pick, it'll be with it.  Jonathan Ogden didn't start at T for the Ravens his rookie year.  He actually started inside at G.  Does that mean he wasn't worth the 4th overall pick in 1996?  Of course not.  I'm thinking there is a good chance we will lose/part company with Cam Robinson after this season since the bulk of the cap liability will be gone after this season.  We will need that cap room to re-sign Trevor Lawrence.  Once he's gone, Trevor Lawrence will still need protection.  At minimum, we'll still have Walker Little at one of the tackles.  It would help the offense tremendously if our replacements at T would be at least familiar with the offense, how to break down film as a professional, etc

I thinkTorrence would be a fine addition to the team and would almost certaintly be a huge upgrade at LG.  But if a T prospect of comparable talent can actually succeed outside and Torrence can't, I'd be willing to let him sit a year if it helps ensure better protection and run blocking along the OL.

---