You know... I didn't even read the op. I just figured it was out of context [BLEEP]. I've since done a deep dive on the issue, only to find that it's mostly out of context [BLEEP]. Tucker was specific about his concerns. He said Sidney Powell was a liar. She was. He didn't support her. The only thing he said AFTER he texted that is that we don't know anything about these machines. He can believe both things at once. He can think she's a liar and still want more information on the machines.

I felt the EXACT same way. I gave her a period of time to prove her claims, and I HOPED she had a "kraken," but it became clear very quickly that didn't. She was lying and probably off her rocker. I was probably one of the first conservatives here to move on from the machine narrative. I still didn't know if the machines had anything to do with the election or not. Considering the circumstances, it's only natural that they should be investigated for integrity. Literally EVERY person in America should want that. The only people that didn't are gullible ideologues who believe everything is on the up and up at all times (unless told otherwise by the MSM who is completely on the up and up, lol). Real democracy requires a healthy bit of skepticism, and there aren't enough of you that have it. Using this "email" thing like it's proof of something is just another example of where you guys fail to implement healthy skepticism.

If any of you ever listened to what Tucker actually says during independent interviews, it's not shocking to me at all that he hates Trump. That's not his job to like the guy. It's his job to spin the news in such a way that resonates with his viewers. He's a pundit, not a journalist. This is exactly what's wrong with our ENTIRE media complex. It makes me laugh that you guys think Fox is special based on any of these emails. They express a corporation's interest in ratings. Big deal.

Looking at the Hannity, Ingram, and Murdoch texts, are mostly mad at Fox for calling the election early. They felt the executives were in too big a hurry to call it for ratings, and it hurt their brand. It did... especially as the election results got narrower in favor of Trump. They did call it too soon. Even though they were right, there was no way they should have called it that early. None of those text used by dominion prove anything except that the pundits knew they were going to piss off their audience with that call. I don't see the "lies" you guys are referring to in any of these emails.

These emails weren't entered into evidence as an example of lies... they were entered in as an example of malice, which is necessary to win a defamation lawsuit. From what I can read, it looks like the main program that actually lied was Lou Dobbs, which the internal memos also declare. By combining the company's interest in ratings and showing the apparent discrepancy between on air and private behaviors, the lawyers of this case got a settlement largely based off Fox's news failing to shut down Lou Dobbs. He was fired btw.

Once again, we enter the world of double standards that are wielded to recklessly by our supposed informed moderates. We can hate Fox. They are ESPECIALLY bad, lol. This isn't a problem endemic in the system or anything... it's is just a Fox problem. We have PROOF. I am getting so worn out by politics because I am just constantly depressed at how easy good people can be manipulated. I have no problem with wanting an honest and transparent media. None. I would do anything to make that happen. We can't do that, because you guys just don't hold anyone to the fire (unless they are right wingers). You're just moldable tools that take soundbites and run with them to the good of one side, and the detriment of another. The ratchet only works one way. Always. Frequency bias in full affect.

---