I was curious in whether our picks were considered "value" by the various media outlets.  I found a site that provided the rankings from the various sites that ranked draft prospects.  I used the median ranking for each of our draft picks.  I think that's fairer than average.  Average sometimes gets distorted by one ignorant person.  In the case of an even number of sites evaluating the player, I averaged the two rankings in the middle.  Below are our draft pick's positions compared to where they were ranked.  For example, if they were ranked 18th and drafted 20th, it would be +2.  If they were ranked 50th and drafted 40th, it would be -10.  Positive numbers are good negative numbers are bad.  Here are how our picks faired:

Antonio Johnson +110
Parker Washington +55
Tank Bigsby -0.5
Anton Harrison -3
Yasir Abdullah -9
Tyler Lacy -37
Ventrell Miller -38
Brenton Strange -47.5
Derek Parish -52
Cooper Hodges -205
Raymond Vohasek -233

Erick Hallett wasn't listed on their site, but that's not a good sign either.  

Basically, according to this, we got 2 steals, 3 just short of fair value and 6 major reaches of more than 1 round.  

Take it for what it's worth, but based upon pre-draft prospect projections, we did a poor job of getting value in this draft.

---