It's funny Bigsby was potentially one of our better value picks yet also wasn't particularly a need. I reckon we'll look back and he'll be an asset.

Ettiene did struggle particularly near the end to maintain the workload we were asking. Having a similar but slightly worse version will allow him to stay fresher and less likely to get injured. Plus perhaps we can use it to free him up as a pass catcher more. RB committees is the modern way, having a good one should make us look good.

I liked the choice of tackle and TE in rd1/2, RB questionable. I think for most the issue seems to be the ulinability to trade back into Rd3. Ultimately we'll never know how achievable or not that was.

Out of interest what were the other trades back into Rd 3?

---