(05-28-2023, 05:36 PM)jj82284 Wrote:

(05-28-2023, 05:12 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Horse [BLEEP] 

It wasn't "an unarmed woman" 

It was a mob of insurrectionists (some with more innocuous intent than others albeit, doesn't matter in this instance) and she just happened to be the first one through the window in front of the last line of defense of lawmakers. They acted as they should have in that scenario. To protect our elected officials. 

And I'm sorry, there is absolutely nothing wrong with calling a duck a duck. 
She was there illegally and seeking to interfere with legal process to verify an election.
However confused, disturbed, or misled she may have been. 

You're just so twisted up in the alternative facts and conspiracy surrounding this you can't see the plain and simple truth of it.

No one was shot over political differences, LOL. No clue what the hell you are talking about there, pal. That's insanely NOT the scenario here.

I do not say this lightly, this is why "social justice" which is just collective justice is the most powerful manifestation of evil in our world today full stop.  

Because you dislike a group of people you convince yourself that those associated with said group loose their basic rights as human beings.   You're not even arguing that babbitt posed a threat of death or bodily injury.  That would be comical.  Your entire argument is based on "those people bad, they don't deserve to live"  that kind if callous heinous, vile, hate filled propaganda poses a dar greater threat to constitutional order than a riot @ the capital.   You and Marty should be ashamed of yourselves.

I literally never said any of this garbage you are feebly attempting to attribute to me!

Read my words.  Read them. 
 And stop putting words in my mouth. 

She broke the law and the mob that she was part of posed a threat that made lethal force unfortunate but necessary. 
It is so [BLEEP] simple. 

You're just emotional about something that you've contorted in your mind into something it isn't.

---