(05-30-2023, 04:04 AM)jj82284 Wrote:

(05-30-2023, 01:15 AM)p_rushing Wrote: You need read about how people are nominated and who controls it. If you think Trump was free to select anyone he wanted, you are mistaken. It goes back to them basically creating the 4th branch and controlling who can take leadership regardless of who the president is.

How do you get rid of the swamp if the swamp has to approve your pick before it even gets to congress?


On the trial stuff, there were lots of feds in the group. The evidence was some talking but no actual actions. The feds once again entrap them and the feds won't even reveal who/how many there were. There is video of them talking about doing the complete opposite of what you are saying. Did the fed members talk back and forth and bring the ideas up?

The entire thing is circus and we aren't being allowed to see the truth of it.


Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

What?  You can't just say something like that ad try to assign us homework.  What was preventing him from selecting someone he wanted or firing Wray anytime he wanted?

Youre right. A quick Google search tells me that the Senate rejected 3 of Trump's proposed appointments during his 4 years in office.  Trump wasn't afraid of nominating men he wasn't "supposed to" nominate. Therefore, Trump is either innocent and stupid for appointing a swamp creature that hates him as FBI leader, or Wray is a competent and unbiased man who can not avoid prosecuting criminals like the January 6th participants. Neither interpretation reflects well on 45. Pick one.

---