(07-07-2023, 04:35 AM)p_rushing Wrote:

(07-06-2023, 07:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: Even if you think enough votes were faked to change the election result, Pence still did what the law says he should have done.
The votes were opened.
The votes were counted.
The objections to the votes were heard.  
The objections were voted on.  There were not enough votes for the objectors.  If more members of Congress saw credible evidence that there were millions of fake votes, those votes would have gone differently.
The end.
Pence presided over that process as the law required him to.  He never had the power to change the outcome on his own.

Wrong ... Pence was the one that said he would send them back and the American people would hear the evidence.

He said exactly what he didn't do. He can't change history and pretend he didn't say it.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

That's not the process.
"Send them back" means the US senate and US house consider the claims separately.  They consider one state at a time.  If they agree about what the votes from that state should be, then it's done. They agreed.   The House and Senate each agreed that the votes from AZ and PA were the right votes.
But if they don't agree, then the law says they have to call up the governor of that state and he or she decides.
The process does not call for any kind of trial where "the American people would hear the evidence".
Read title 3 of the United States Code.  It's all there.

---