Here’s an example of intentional press bias. This California state official was booted from a school board meeting because he would not follow rules for his allotted time to speak. But that isn’t the story. He was sent there to speak against this local school board’s ruling that parents should be notified if a student expresses an interest in transgenderism. Imagine that, the state is against notifying parents of a potential life altering choice made by a child. 

The Sacramento Bee, which is owned by a corporation which owns other media outlets, failed to include a quote from this state official who called these parents “extremists” for wanting to know what their children are becoming involved in at school. No, if you want to find that quote, you have to go to Fox News to see it.

https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/educat...31868.html

"I don’t mind being thrown out of a board meeting by extremists. I can take the heat — it’s part of the job. What I can’t accept is the mistreatment of vulnerable students whose privacy is being taken away," he added.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ca-school-...t-children

Seems to me the reading public would want to know if a representative of the state called parents and a local school board “extremists” for wanting to know about their own children.

In no way am I defending Fox News as the arbiters of truth and neutrality. But when a paper intentionally omits an important fact that directly addresses, and affects, their own local readers, it clearly shows an agenda.

---