The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Can RB devaluing be fixed?
|
07-25-2023, 07:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2023, 07:33 PM by flgatorsandjags. Edited 1 time in total.)
(07-25-2023, 06:19 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:(07-25-2023, 12:41 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: RBs aren't devalued. One just got drafted with the 8th pick, another with the 2 pick. Multiple backs got tagged. If they were devalued they wouldn't be getting tagged and drafted so early. Chubb, McCaffrey, Henry, Jones etc. all got long term deals. It's just a position where the player declines at a younger age than most and teams are trying to protect themselves and get it right when they do No they aren't. Teams are just being smarter about it being they have a shorter shelf life. Why not use the tag on the position with the shorter shelf life? If they were devalued one wouldnt of just got selected with the 8th pick and one with the 12th. Hell, we just took one in the first a couple years ago and its looking like a damn good pick whether you liked it or not. Not to mention one was taken right before Etienne as well. If you draft a RB in the first why not just use his first 5 years on the rookie contract with the 5 year option and then tag him twice, thats 7 years and just covering your own [BLEEP] in the last couple instead of the huge contract. If hes 21 or 22 when drafted he will be 28 or 29 after those 7 years and usually when backs start to decline a bit. Teams are just being smarter about it and covering their own [BLEEP] and i still think backs will continue to go in the 1st and 2nd rounds if the talent is there being how valuable they can be. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.