(08-08-2023, 01:52 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(08-08-2023, 01:41 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Of course, all evidence can be hand waved away. When thousands of voting documents are delivered by a Democrat voting outreach and those ballots are signed by the same person and filled with addresses and phone numbers that don't exist it's perfectly rational to assume no foul play occurred. Because of course it is.

That's not what the article you posted says. Not even close. Check again. 

---

You will admit that Winger is correct about online suppression, won't you?

Nope!! He blathers on about wanting Democrats dead here as much as he wants. Was he suppressed? 

Private entities acting against hate speech and propaganda under their legal authority to do so a'int got [BLEEP] to do with this discussion. 

Is their a need for some unification in this new landscape of evolving social media to sort out what is and isn't free speech? 
Yeah - sure.
But the laws of America didn't change under one of these recent administrations to take anyone's freedom in such a way. Private sector companies did what they did individually to pursue what best suited their business model. 

For Twitter - it was about suppressing dis/misinformation. For FB it was allowing Russian bots to spout propaganda ad infinitum. 

Take your pick - neither were perfect in their efforts and those are just two very disparate examples.