(10-08-2023, 02:06 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(10-08-2023, 02:02 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Lol, sure, I get the Hutch over Neal. Hutch is a good player, but my focus was on what's best for keeping Lawrence alive, something this team hasn't focused on nearly enough IMO.

You let the draft come to you and not go reaching every pick for certain positions.   We had a few opportunities last year where we could of helped fix our oline and took the top guy but we made a Strange pick.

---

(04-30-2021, 03:03 AM)Eric1 Wrote: And if there was a redraft, Fournette would have went in the 4th round, instead of 4th overall in his draft class. Funny how hindsight is 3 years later though huh? Nobody cares about hindsight, you can play that game for nearly everybody.

Etienne was a bad pick at 25. Point, blank, period.

(10-08-2023, 02:05 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: Terrible pick? Virtually no one said that. The criticism was about taking a RB when there were arguably better choices on the board.

They didn't say terrible they just said bad point blank lol

But that's the crux, we took ETN instead of a better lineman and now years later we're still affected by that opportunity cost. You take the best player at the most important position of need and RB is almost never that guy. It goes: QB, LT, DE, CB, WR, RT, LB, C, S, G, RB. That's the modern NFL; build for the QB and the passing game; fill in the rest as needed.

---