(10-08-2023, 05:48 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(10-08-2023, 05:42 PM)carp8dm Wrote: I mean, wow.  Bro.  Just go eat all the bacon and eggs you need.  I'll keep the crow for you on ice.

How can I discuss reality with you when you just start your discussion with an absolute falsehood?

PS:  "Nothing changed - not at all"

That's a double negative...  You just admitted that the offense did change!!!

Seriously.  If you don't want to have a real discussion, just say so.  But don't insult my intelligence, man.  This was an absolute different game from week 2, 3, and even 4.  You know it.  I know it.  Duuuvaall!!!  knows it.

---

DUUUUUVAAAAAAAL!!!!!

Which plays were different besides the Ridley end around?

Name them

Uhhh...  The entire 1st quarter was pass first?  

Uhhhh, the first major run by Elite-EN as an off tackle in the 2nd quarter?

Uhhhh, we started throwing deep???

Uhhhhh, the entire game plan?

Like did you watch the game?

---

(10-08-2023, 05:52 PM)Dockerill91 Wrote:

(10-08-2023, 05:42 PM)carp8dm Wrote: I mean, wow.  Bro.  Just go eat all the bacon and eggs you need.  I'll keep the crow for you on ice.

How can I discuss reality with you when you just start your discussion with an absolute falsehood?

PS:  "Nothing changed - not at all"

That's a double negative...  You just admitted that the offense did change!!!

Seriously.  If you don't want to have a real discussion, just say so.  But don't insult my intelligence, man.  This was an absolute different game from week 2, 3, and even 4.  You know it.  I know it.  Duuuvaall!!!  knows it.

---

DUUUUUVAAAAAAAL!!!!!

I agree with your overall point, it was a completely different offense.

However, that statement that you quoted isn’t a double negative.

oop, you're right.  It's a double negative.  But it was a double negative to make his point.  Thanks for pointing it out.  I concede that point.  My defense is that this guy is contradictiing himself constantly, and I got a bit overly aggressive.

My bad.  

Apoligies to NYC4Jags.

---