(10-08-2023, 10:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-08-2023, 10:38 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: I can point you to several dozen studies, but many of them are linked in this brief. it's a conservative policy think tank, but the academic links are solid.

https://assets.americafirstpolicy.com/as...ociety.pdf

I'm aware of all of that.
If Octavian wasn't able to reduce the rate of fatherlessness in Rome, how will you or L2L do any better?  What law or program would you implement?

It's all cultural and what's acceptable.

When democrats lost their slaves, they had to take over the civil rights movement. Before then I believe black kids had a higher percentage of both parents living together (can't remember if it was also married but most likely was). Once you give more money away if the father isn't there, women kicked them out. Then the fathers know they aren't wanted and in turn they started treating women like dumpsters.

This was then expanded to all races and now is an economic issue.

Add in all the other stuff to supposedly "help" and its destroyed a very family oriented culture.

Rome was a very messed up place and depending on where you were, the culture was very different. There's no way to know as your weren't specific in where. Rome had a lot of the issues that we are fighting today appected in their culture towards the end before it collapsed.


Simple program to help the most. Provide more assistance for 2 parent homes. Provide less assistance for single parent homes. You can also fine/tax men who have kids with multiple women and aren't living with one of them.

There's no law or program that will fix it though as the people involved have to want to change. Women have the ability to put an immediate stop to it but you can't tell women to do that today. The men involved can't even stay with one woman so there's no way they could have enough control to refrain and make the women change.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

---