Here are some of your "incredulous that I'm blind to reality"  posts:

Quote:Lol. You guys are hilarious. So... let me just get this straight. We have video evidence of this man actively encouraging people to raid the Capitol. The crowd is chanting FED as he speaks, because it's obvious to them that he's an outsider. The next day, he's seen inciting the public to go INTO the Capitol building. Moments before the barriers are breached, he whispers something to the man who initiates the breach. Then he enters the Capitol while telling everyone to enter the Capitol. 

The NY Times... who HATES J6 protestors... who finds them to be an abomination to our "DEMOCRACY," is defending Ray Epps? A guy who supposedly represents the worst of the MAGA movement? A guy who thought the election was SO stolen, he tried over and over again to work up a crown to breech the Capitol building? On video? This guy? This is who they are defending? What is wrong with you guys, man? 

Ray Epps is suing Fox, guys. He must be innocent. They told us so. Those are the FACTS.

Quote:Did you watch the video? It's all on tape, man. What's there to swallow? You can see it. It's on video. Just watch it. I seriously don't understand you guys. That dude should be prosecuted. Period. Why are any of you defending him? Why is he not being charged? He literally represents EVERYTHING the media and the moderates and the leftist claim is wrong with the MAGA crowd. He's on film, inciting storming the Capitol. These are reasonable questions and none of the "enlightened" on here are even asking these questions. Why don't you ask the questions?

Quote:Aside from that, you guys still won't acknowledge that there were multiple, disingenuous agitators there that day. Ray Epps should be in jail. Period. There is no reason this guy is still unprosecuted unless he's protected. He's on video giving a command to two young men to remove the barriers. We know from multiple trials that the FBI was there undercover. We know there were some known ANTIFA affiliates present. We have, on video, some type of undercover personnel changing out of plain clothes and being welcomed into the building by other police, and they were claiming to be dressed as ANTIFA agents. 

You ignore ALL of this. Why is it hard to admit that the government may have played a role in what happened that day?

There you go pal.

The way you imply certainty about Epps was no different than the way I implied certainty about Trump.
which was what you tried to call me out on

Try harder. 

I don't really give a [BLEEP] about you speaking to your beliefs on a topic that way - but you tried to deflect the actual topic here by calling me out for the exact same [BLEEP] you do , so...  here we are. 

Hey - I've got an idea - why don't you try to weasel out of the actual point of the thread by trying to instruct me about the definition of some word you pulled out of your [BLEEP] in a weak attempt at snark? 
That will serve to further a "real discussion", right?? 

Just let the stupid semantics go and debate the damn topic if you actually have anything to add.

---