(11-03-2023, 10:13 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(11-02-2023, 11:13 PM)p_rushing Wrote: Yes that is standard practice but in those cases the person admitted to something that was charged but was being given lesser sentences.

Right now no one has admitted to breaking any laws to do with the rico charges. When they testify, they will say no laws were broken. Trump will present the evidence of fraud and it will be not guilty.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

Why do you assume the bolded? 

How do you think you know who will and won't testify with damaging testimony against Trump, and how do you think you know what they will and won't say?

You have no idea. We can only guess. Based on what I've seen following cases with multiple defendants in the past -
It is my opinion that they used these plea deals to coerce damaging testimony out of one or more of those defendants. It's a perfectly reasonable thing to expect. And again - reporters with protected sources are saying this is the case. 

You can disagree - but you don't know beyond doubt any more than I do.