(11-05-2023, 06:51 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(11-05-2023, 06:45 PM)carp8dm Wrote: So an aging RB that has injury history is worthy of a 2nd, 3rd, 4th in 2023.  And another 4th in 2024.  49ers basically just threw away their entire 2023 draft for a running back...

But yeah, you're right.  Dude is different....

But drafting ETN in the late 1st round was a shanda!!!  A shanda, larry!!!

I mean, the cognitive dissonance some folks must feel every day could activate a Star Gate.

A conference finalist acquiring the final piece to give themselves a Super Bowl. Not remotely the same as a bad team using a 1 in the draft. But keep knocking down that scarecrow.

Ahhh, that's a nice spin!  Good one.  Keep that up.  You might get us to the Star Gate with that level of dissonance. 

So a conference finalist that has no legit QB, but had spent all their prior draft capital on a QB (are you familiar with a person called Trey Lance?), should then waste even more draft capital for a RB? Because RB is more important for them?  Because, reasons?  

And before you answer this question, remember that you also just replied to me in another thread about how in the "long term" things go sideways because of cap space...  Remember??  Remember how you said that?  

You have died on the hill that RBs are not valuable.  And that GM's should focus on other areas that are "more valuable".

Oh, but if you have wasted several years of draft capital, it's OK to waste more on a RB that can only help you for a year or so.  Because... Reasons?  Purdy is so great that they can waste 2 years of drafts for a RB?  LOL

I'm honestly trying to understand your logic.  But it makes no sense, my friend.  Just let it go.  ETN was the right pick.  We didn't even waste 1 draft, much less drafts for a great RB.  You're trying to fight off your bad take with other bad takes.  They are all bad because they are fundamentally flawed and make no sense if you think them through.

---