(11-06-2023, 04:12 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(11-06-2023, 04:08 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: I'm very confused with how the team has handled the Zay Jones injury. Why wasn't he placed on IR sooner?

Probably still hoping to have him back. Plenty of football left. I think they said he worked out today with the team so he should be back at some point. 

I just hope they consider giving Cooks more meaningful snaps or opportunities out there if Zay can't go. We need somebody that can get downfield and make some plays. 

Cooks has the size and speed to do that.

There are WRs that can take Zay Jone's position.  But there is only 1 Zay Jones.  The dude always comes up big in the end zone.  I just want everyone to remember how great that Zay is.  He's great.  We are lucky to have him.  I hope to the Football Gods that he comes back next year.  The dude is just clutch.  He always has been, and he's simpatico with Trevor.

---

(11-06-2023, 04:13 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(11-06-2023, 04:01 PM)carp8dm Wrote: Now you're getting combative  Just calm down.

You have clearly stated that CMC is good.  I don't have to quote it back to you, do I?  You basically said that CMC is a RB that is amazing, "he's different".  Well, I just pointed out what the 49ers gave up to get CMC.  

You and flsprtgod have been hyper critical of picking ETN in the late 1st round.

I don't think it's out of bounds to point out that ETN is by far the better pick versus your sloppy love of CMC considering the fact that the 49ers gave up a 1st, a 2nd, a 3rd, and two 4ths...  ETN and CMC are pretty much statistically similar.  But at least we only used a late 1st round pick, whereas SF used practically an entire draft class to get a 6 year RB!!!

I'm not implying anything.  I'm just pointing out how illogical your logic is.  

But again, it's your opinion.  I just respectfully disagree.

Regarding the upcoming game... It's a game that pits the 49ers versus the Jaguars.  Personnel decisions should be in bounds when discussing the upcoming game on Sunday.  I don't think I'm doing anything that is "out of bounds" considering the talking point of this game within this thread.

Though I do feel you are insulting and yelling at me, which I don't appreciate and find worthy of review.

Damn man, get it right. The trade was a 2, 3, and 4 in 23 and a 4 in 24. No 1's were involved. Again, the Jags taking an RB with a 1 coming off a 1-15 season is a mile different from the 49ers trading some picks coming of an NFCC loss. That you can't reconize nuance doesn't refute the logic of our position, it just shows that you still don't understand what's being said. And no, I wouldn't have made that trade.

apologies.  You're right.  They didn't give up their 1st.  Just the rest of their draft...  Sorry for the confusion.

---