(11-07-2023, 01:03 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Holy hell, the internet and social media were rampant with metric tons of disinformation in that cycle.
(Most of it foreign propaganda that ultimately doesn't aid ANY of us.)
So of course there were efforts to curb it.
AND - of course several of the more extreme legislators well known to post "alternate facts" got censored. 

This article - like most of the whining from pedophile-harboring Jim Jordan and Fox infotainment - is utter horse [BLEEP].

But what do you expect?  This is coming from a movement whose whole philosophy has become: "you can believe whatever the [BLEEP] you want! Alternate facts are awesome! We don't need truth to put conservatives in office! Americans are morons! Just tell them you're Christian and love guns! They'll vote for you!" 

LOL

(11-07-2023, 01:47 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-07-2023, 08:07 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: That’s what they’re trying to do now. Don’t you read the papers?

Oh what a relief.  I assume you support these efforts as well?

---

(11-07-2023, 08:59 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Yes, because it's clear that Trump benefitted from these polices. You're so daft.

So you're saying he didn't benefit from his own policies.  I guess he proved pretty incompetent then, huh?