Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Government worked to ‘censor Americans’ prior to 2020 election

#29

(11-09-2023, 11:18 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(11-09-2023, 10:25 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: DUH! That's something that should be unspoken at this point. You're not clever or competent for pointing out how an executive order works. Technically, it's a clarification to his agencies on how to interpret to law with regard to social media protection, right? The goal is what, though, Mikey? What's the goal? Take one more step. Please.

Here, let me help you: That order intended to restrict the circumstances under which social media companies could claim immunity from liability for content moderation decisions, potentially leading to a stricter regulatory approach. Why? To change social media behavior. I should not have to explain that to you. It's a waste of my time, and everyone else's on this board. Take one more step. Always. Take one more step. It's unreal how bad you are at thinking, even if it's just an attempt to win an argument.

Now that I've wasted 5 minutes of my time catching you up on basic deduction, answer the question I posed to you and stop deflecting.

P.S. Stop trying to be smug. That works for NYC, but you're bad at it. Maybe if you can figure out what we're talking about without me having to break it into baby steps, you can try your hand at it again.

That's not "telling them to stop."
 
That's "someday soon it might be easier for users to sue you." The users could sue potentially for their content being removed, or, importantly, for competing content being promoted, even unintentionally.  So a platform might have to moderate *more.* Not because the President wants them to, because his opinion *does not count* for this, but because the *users who choose to sue in court* want the platform to do so.

I'm not trying to be smug.  I'm not trying to win any adulation either.  I'm just trying to have an educated conversation.

See what I mean? You're trying to have a semantics debate about restrict or stop just to avoid losing an argument. You are a terrible at arguing in good faith. At least NYC is willing to stay consistent. Trump is a grifter. It's his belief. He attributes that intent to everything Trump does. The EO is just a political stunt. He didn't answer, but I'm going to assume he thinks Trump is aware of how agencies were working hand in hand with social media companies to censor Americans. Are you suggesting that is your belief or not (for the third time).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 11-07-2023, 08:07 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 11-07-2023, 01:47 PM
RE: Government worked to ‘censor Americans’ prior to 2020 election - by Lucky2Last - 11-10-2023, 12:17 AM
copycat - by copycat - 11-11-2023, 04:45 PM



Users browsing this thread:
14 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!