(11-05-2023, 12:03 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: That's ridiculous. You and I are weighing in on the same "evidence." That phone call is all the public has to go on regarding Trump's election interference, and it's weak on its own. As to your belief they have more evidence than that, sure that's a possibility. It's not been true historically, but you believe that if you want. As to Trump suggesting that Raffensberger do a better job investigating the election results, I just don't believe that qualifies unless the law is written in a way that makes it so, which I have not seen and you have not provided.