(11-13-2023, 06:49 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(11-05-2023, 12:03 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: That's ridiculous. You and I are weighing in on the same "evidence." That phone call is all the public has to go on regarding Trump's election interference, and it's weak on its own. As to your belief they have more evidence than that, sure that's a possibility. It's not been true historically, but you believe that if you want. As to Trump suggesting that Raffensberger do a better job investigating the election results, I just don't believe that qualifies unless the law is written in a way that makes it so, which I have not seen and you have not provided.

Wait... You think you the prosecution doesn't have any evidence beyond what you and I have seen? 

Seriously?

wow

---

In other news:

The plea deal flippers are beginning to sing their songs in proffer sessions with prosecutors.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/boss-leave-pro...=104831939

Did you watch the videos or read the story?

So there is hearsay that Trump wasn't going to leave office. Well Trump left so it's a lie or meaningless.

Powell actually said there was fraud and she believes it. She met with Trump a few times to discuss the fraud.

These witnesses do nothing for the get Trump people.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

---