Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Government worked to ‘censor Americans’ prior to 2020 election

#60

(11-14-2023, 01:10 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: You have a worldview. We all do.
NO [BLEEP]. I'm saying it's laughable (insane really) that you think you can analyze and define mine from posts on a MB. 
Are you suggesting that because I stated that the information I posted in the first paragraph shouldn't be debatable (because it is well documented), that I am doing what I accuse you of doing?
I think I clearly said you were doing what you are accusing me of.

AND NO - you stated plenty of opinion and then claimed it shouldn't be debatable - look:

Quote:No. It's not obvious. Conservatives have been saying for YEARS that the state departments are becoming political. Personally, I think they've always been political. However, the politics have changed enough to upset the balance that had been there previously. Some people want to believe this is malicious, but I think it's beyond that. Minus the natural hiring and promoting bias that has been shown in studies to be true of the left, I think most of this is a natural result of government bloat, which is more in line with progressive ideology. Couple that with entrenched, unelected bureaucrats and the shifting influence of corporations that are increasingly identifying with the left, and you have a recipe for agencies within departments that can and do function in their own interests.

Look at your last post? Where is there any content? When I say you confidently assert yourself, it's "I'm right, you're wrong." You have literally brought up your own opinion of yourself as evidence you are pwning me on a "political side forum on a football message board." That is so horribly misted you should be ashamed.  You're the ChrisJagBoy of the political forum. Then you really should be ashamed!

Quote:C'mon man. Do you seriously not see your pattern of deflection by focusing on minute details completely sidebar to the original topic??

You do it a lot.

It's like those roaches scurrying away when you flip on the light. You rush off to some peripheral detail to get lost in when the original debate isn't going your way.

Just because you don't care about context, doesn't make it any less important. It's your disregard for these types of details that makes you less informed and less objective, imo, but you do you.
Riiiiiight, I don't fall for some sidebar deflection bull [BLEEP] - so I don't care about context. 
Not my fault you if you can't get your head around the concept of relevancy. 


Oh, by the way, do you notice how when you try to psychoanalyze me, I try to point out why you're getting it wrong. I do that for two reasons.
I'm not trying to psychoanalyze you. 
I'm commenting on your posting tendencies. 
I don't need to know what exact brand of crazy you are. None of us are perfect. 

Firstly, I'm not a whiny little [BLEEP], and secondly because I'm ok with strangers trying to figure out motivations. Unless you're an algorithm that's programmed to post stupid [BLEEP], you're probably trying to figure out the motives and reasoning when you're debating with other posters. You're not special in this regard, but, hey, way to confidently assert yourself. 
Yeah - I'm afraid I don't waste my time trying to "figure out" the motives of folks who post things on the internet. 
Sorry that seems unbelievable to you. 
Most people are stupid. I don't worry too much about that. 


I hope anyone that takes you seriously can look at your last post and see them for what you suggest they are, posts on a football message board that are void of context and shouldn't be taken seriously.

No - none of this [BLEEP] should be taken seriously. Thought that was obvious. 

Clearly not for you. 

 I need to stop being such a jerk in my response to your posts because you seem to be getting more upset than I anticipated. 

I sort of enjoyed unloading on you because you talk down to folks so often and unnecessarily attack Mike all the time, but I don't want to keep derailing threads with personal [BLEEP] - and you are clearly too weak to take from me the crap you dish to Mike. You should consider that last bit moving forward if you really are not a whiny little [BLEEP] as you claim.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 11-07-2023, 08:07 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 11-07-2023, 01:47 PM
copycat - by copycat - 11-11-2023, 04:45 PM
RE: Government worked to ‘censor Americans’ prior to 2020 election - by NYC4jags - 11-14-2023, 12:54 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!