(12-06-2023, 08:22 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(12-06-2023, 09:04 AM)Mikey Wrote: we ran that stupid play multiple times and it never worked. It's like betting on the Washington Generals because they gotta be due, man.

We ran it with Agnew, it sucked. Most every time we run it with Ridley, it sucks. Maybe we can give Parker a go, see if he can suck too.

---

absolutely, but doesn't mean that crap play calls shouldn't be deleted from the play sheet.

Ridley has carries of 10, 11, and 18 on that play, so it does work sometimes.

sometimes isn't a good look when there were better options to call.  In my opinion.  

Of course, if the play worked I'm sure you would be all about it.  But the play just didn't work, and more often than naught, these slow developing plays don't work when you have a suspect O-Line that can't protect...  For example the 4th and Goal against the Texans at the end of the 1st half.  There was no reason to run a play like that when it was easy to get Lawrence to QB sneak....  

I mean, it's been established by all of the forum that the O-Line is not good.  Why call a play that is slow developing and puts pressure on our O-Line to execute?

Just bad play calling...  Yes the O-Line is bad too.  But when one acknowledges that a weakness is apparent, one does not push forward upon said weakness.

---